hewasalreadyme: So let us assume that at least some of these women (and we can surmise from their skirts that they are predominantly women) were the mothers of the children they held. What is perhaps strangest to me is the number of women who are not wearing a black covering–something that would blend into the background, especially once the images were cropped or matted, as several have commented they would be. Instead, however, several women are draped in pattered throws…These mothers are not merely effaced–they are shown to be effaced.  Their absence becomes a presence in these images; indeed, it becomes the focal point of the images.  These images, consciously or unconsciously, mark the mother–or the mother-proxy–as the subject of effacement. A lamp, a chaise, a rug, a mother.  Domestic objects all. “Where’s Ma? Oh, she’s the one ensconced in the rug.” (Part I) « Susan E. Cook, Ph.D.  She also made a response that talked about the possibility that the children in these portraits were dead. It’s absolutely worth reading/looking at.

hewasalreadyme:

So let us assume that at least some of these women (and we can surmise from their skirts that they are predominantly women) were the mothers of the children they held. What is perhaps strangest to me is the number of women who are not wearing a black covering–something that would blend into the background, especially once the images were cropped or matted, as several have commented they would be. Instead, however, several women are draped in pattered throws…These mothers are not merely effaced–they are shown to be effaced.  Their absence becomes a presence in these images; indeed, it becomes the focal point of the images.  These images, consciously or unconsciously, mark the mother–or the mother-proxy–as the subject of effacement.

A lamp, a chaise, a rug, a mother.  Domestic objects all.

“Where’s Ma? Oh, she’s the one ensconced in the rug.” (Part I) « Susan E. Cook, Ph.D.

 She also made a response that talked about the possibility that the children in these portraits were dead. It’s absolutely worth reading/looking at.

(Source: tynskychram, via vintageyoungins)

174 Notes

  1. alifeinside reblogged this from kalyiel
  2. thartfuldodgr reblogged this from fuckyeahvictorians
  3. mourningvictorian reblogged this from callmevictorian
  4. twohandedengine reblogged this from romulanholiday and added:
    #ar i feel this would be relevant to your interests You are correct, my good sir.
  5. transparent-fish reblogged this from fuckyeahvictorians
  6. splendiforis reblogged this from tynskychram
  7. underthescars reblogged this from fitisunderneathfat
  8. renduck8504 reblogged this from acciocuddles and added:
    Old-timey photography was always so creepy!
  9. acciocuddles reblogged this from alexshortandsweet
  10. alexshortandsweet reblogged this from fuckyeahvictorians
  11. jerseyknitsheets reblogged this from callmevictorian
  12. callmevictorian reblogged this from fuckyeahvictorians
  13. coffeesweetbalm reblogged this from wildjackalopes
  14. paperwhale reblogged this from fuckyeahvictorians
  15. godmusthateus reblogged this from tipsygnostalgics
  16. tipsygnostalgics reblogged this from fuckyeahvictorians
  17. mrbughuul reblogged this from fuckyeahvictorians
  18. creepersgonnacreep reblogged this from gallifreaky
  19. gallifreaky reblogged this from vintageyoungins
  20. kalyiel reblogged this from fuckyeahvictorians
  21. agirlnamedfrangipane reblogged this from fuckyeahvictorians
  22. roffelcoptah reblogged this from formyevann
  23. formyevann reblogged this from vintageyoungins
  24. securelyonafairywing reblogged this from fuckyeahvictorians
  25. virginal-perversions reblogged this from fuckyeahvictorians
  26. asundry reblogged this from fuckyeahvictorians
  27. moxieandlace reblogged this from fuckyeahvictorians and added:
    Ugh, and thanks to this I spent all evening reading about hidden mothers in photography and itching to go through my...